AL MURAJAAT SHII SUNNI DIALOGUE pdf download

Al Murajaat Shii Sunni Dialogue

AL MURAJAAT SHII SUNNI DIALOGUE

Some Book Contents

• Requesting More Relevant Texts
• Letter 10
• A Glimpse of Sufficient Texts
• Letter 11
• I Admiring Our Clear Texts,
• II Wondering at Compromising Them With the Majority’s Beliefs,
• III Asking for Clear Signs from the Book. A Glimpse of Sufficient Texts
• Letter 12
• Qur’anic Proofs
• Letter 13
• Argument Regarding These Traditions Weak
• Letter 14
• I Fallacy of Opponent’s Argument,
• II Opponents do not Know Shi’as,
• III Distinction of Emphasizing Illegality of
• Falsifying Fladith.
• Letter 15
• IA Flash of the Truth,
• II Requesting Details on Sunnis Relying on Shi’a Authorities.
• Letter 16
• A Flundred Shi’a Authorities Relied upon by
• Sunnis
• Letter 17
• I Appreciating the debater’s sentiments,
• II Admitting There is no Objection if Ahlel-Sunnah Rely on Shi’a Authorities,
• III His belief in the Miracles of Ahl al-Bayt,
• IV Dilemma at Compromising the Above with what Ahl Al-Qibla do.
• Letter 18
• I Sentiments Reciprocated,
• II Debater’s Error in Generalizing Regarding Ahl al-Qibla,
• III The Nation’s Politicians are the Ones Who Turned Away from Ahl al-Bayt,
• IV The Imams of Ahl al-Bayt (without any
• argument) are not Inferior to others,
• V Which Fair Court Judges Calling Their Followers “Strayers”?
• Letter 19
• I No Fair Arbitrator Would Call Followers of Ahl al-Bayt Strayers,
• II Following Their Sects is Carrying out the Responsibility,
• III It Could be Said that They Have the Priority to
• Lead,
• IV Requesting Texts Relevant to the Khilafate.
• Letter 20
• IA General Reference to the Texts,
• IIA Reference to the House on the Day of
• Warning,
• III Sunni Reporters of this Hadith.
• Letter 21
• Raising Doubts about the Hadith’s Authenticity
• Letter 22
• I Proving the Text’s Authenticity,
• II Why the Shaykhs Have Not Reported it,
• III Whoever Knows These Shaykhs Knows Why.
• Letter 23
• I Convinced of the Authenticity of this Hadith,
• II Unreliability Based on Non-Sequential Narration,
• III Its Reference to Restricted Succession,
• IV Its Rebuttal.
• Letter 24
• I Why Relying on this Hadith,
• II Restricted Succession is Unanimously Rejected,
• III Revocation is Impossible.
• Letter 25
• I His Belief in the Text,
• II Requesting More Texts.
• Letter 26
• I Clear Texts Recounting Ten of v Ali’s Exclusive
• Merits,
• II Why Rely Upon it.
• Letter 27
• Raising Doubts About the Status Hadith
• Letter 28
• I The Status Hadith Stands on Most Solid Grounds,
• II Binding Proofs,
• III Its Sunni Narrators,
• IV Why al-Amidi Suspects It.
• Letter 29
• I Believing in Our Arguments Regarding the
• Hadith’s Sanad,
• II Doubting its General Application,
• III Doubting its being Binding.
• Letter 30
• I Arabs Regard it General,
• II Disproving Claim of Restriction,
• III Disproving its Non-Binding Application
• Letter 31
• Requesting Sources of this Hadith
• Letter 32
• I Among Its Sources: the Prophet’s Visit to Umm
• Salim,
• II The Case of Hamzah’s Daughter,
• III Leaning on ‘Ali,
• IV The First Fraternity,
• V The Second Fraternity,
• VI Closing the Doors,
• VII The Prophet Comparing ‘Ali and Aaron to the Two Stars
• Letter 33
• When was ‘Ali and Aaron Described as the Two
• Stars?
• Letter 34
• I The Occasion of Shabar, Shubayr, and Mushbir,
• II The Occasion of Fraternity,
• III The Occasion of Closing the Doors.
• Letter 35
• Requesting Other Texts
• Letter 36
• I Hadith by Ibn ‘Abbas,
• II ‘Umran’s Hadith,
• III Buraydah’s Hadith,
• IV Hadith Recounting Ten Exclusive Attributes
• [of’Ali],
• V ‘Ali’s Hadith,
• VI Wahab’s Hadith,
• VII Ibn Abu ‘Asim’s Hadith.
• Letter 37
• “Wali” is a Linguistic Denominator; so, Where is the Text?
• Letter 38
• I Explaining the Implications of “Wali”

II Proving its Connotation