The Historical Role of Islam pdf download

The Historical Role of Islam – An Essay On Islamic Culture by M. N. ROY

Book Introduction

The sudden rise and the dramatic expansion of Mohammedanism constitute a fascinating chapter in the history of humankind.

A dispassionate study of this chapter is of tremendous importance in the present fateful period of the history of India.

THE HISTORICAL ROLE OF ISLAM – AN ESSAY ON ISLAMIC CULTURE

The scientific value of the study by itself is excellent, and the admirable quest – for knowledge is sure to be handsome re – warded. But with us, today in India, particularly with the Hindu, a proper understanding of the historical role of Islam and its contribution to humans: culture has acquired supreme political importance.

This country has become the home of a very considerable number of followers of the Arabian Prophet. One seldom realizes that many more Mohammedans live in India than in any single purely Islamic country.

Still, after the lapse of many centuries, this numerous section of the Indian population is generally considered an extraneous element.

 This curious but extremely regrettable cleft in the loose national structure of India has its historical cause.

The Mohammedans originally came to India as invaders. They conquered the country and became its rulers for several hundred years. That relation of conqueror and the subjugated has left a mark on our nation’s history, which today embraces both. But the unpleasant memory of the past connection has been progressively eclipsed by the present companionship in slavery.

The effect of British Imperialism is no less painful and ruinous for the bulk of the Muslim population than for the masses professing Hinduism. So thoroughly have the Mohammedans become an integral part of the Indian nation that the annals of the Muslim rule are justly recorded as chapters of the history of India. Indeed, Nationalism has gone further in effacing the painful memory of the past.

The practice of seeking consolation for the shame of the present in the real or legendary glory of the past has dressed the Muslim rulers of India in brilliant national colors. Yet, a Hindu, who prides in the prosperity of the reign of an Akbar, or boasts of the architectural accomplishments of a Shahjehan, is even today separated most curiously by an unbridgeable gulf from his next-door neighbor belonging to the race, or professing the faith, of those illustrious monarchs. They are believed to have glorified the history of India.

For the orthodox Hindus who constitute the great majority of the Indian population, the Mussulman, even of noble birth or high education or admirable cultural attainments, is a ‘mleccha impure barbarian who does not deserve a social treatment any better than according to the lowest of the Hindus.

 The cause of this singular situation is to be traced in the prejudice born, in the past, of the hatred a conquered and oppressed people naturally entertained for the foreign invader.

The political relation out of which it sprang is a thing of the past. But the prejudice still persists not only as an effective obstacle to national cohesion but also as a hindrance for a dispassionate view of history. Indeed, there is no other example of two communities living together in the: same country for so many hundred years, and yet having so little appreciation of each other’s culture.

No civilized people in the world are so ignorant of Islamic history and. Contemptuous of the Mohammedan religion. As the Hindus. Spiritual imperialism is an outstanding feature of our nationalist ideology. But this evil spirit is the most pronounced concerning Mohammedanism.

The current notion of the teachings of the Arabian Prophet is exceptionally ill-informed. The average educated Hindu has little knowledge of, and no appreciation for, the immense revolutionary significance of Islam and the tremendous cultural consequences of that revolution.

People could laugh at the prevailing notions as ridiculous were they not so pregnant with harmful consequences. These notions should be combatted for the sake of the national cohesion of the Indian people as well as in the interest of science and historical truth.

A proper appreciation of the cultural significance of Islam is of supreme importance in this crucial period of the history of India. The great historian Gibbon describes the rise and expansion of Islam as “one of the most memorable revolutions which has impressed a new and lasting character on the nations of the globe.”

One is simply amazed to contemplate the incredible rapidity with. “Which the two mightiest empires of the ancient time were subverted by the comparatively small bands of nomads issuing from the Arabian desert, fired with the zeal of a new faith.

 Hardly fifty years had passed since Mohammad assumed the role of the singular Prophet spreading his Message of Peace at the point of the sword, his followers victoriously planted the banner of Islam on the confines of India, on the one side, and on the shore of the Atlantic, on the other.

The first Khalifs of Damascus reigned over an Empire which could not be crossed in less than five months on the fleetest camel. At the end of the first century of the Hegira, the “Commanders of the Faithful” were the most powerful rulers of the world.

Every prophet establishes his pretension by the performance of miracles. On that token, Mohammad must be recognized as by far the greatest of all prophets, before or after him. The expansion of Islam is the most miraculous of all miracles.

 The Roman Empire of Augustus, as later enlarged by the valiant Trajan, was the result of great and glorious victories, won over a period of seven hundred years. Still, it had not attained the proportions of the Arabian Empire -established in less than a century

. The Empire of Alexander represented but a fraction of the vast domain of the Khalifs. For nearly a thousand years, the Persian Empire resisted the arms of Rome, only to be subdued by the “Sword of God” in less than a decade.. Let a modern historian describe the miracle of the rise of Islam. ” Nowhere was there a vestige of an.

Arabian state, of a regular army, or of a common political ambition. The Arabs were poets, dreamers, fighters, traders; they were not politicians. Nor had they found in religion a stabilizing or unifying power. They practiced a low form of polytheism.

A hundred years later, these obscure savages had achieved for themselves a great world power. They had conquered Syria and Egypt, they had overwhelmed and converted. Persia mastered Western Turkestan and part of Punjab.

They had wrested Africa from the Byzantines and the Berbers, Spain from the Visigoths. In the West, they threatened France, in the East Constantinople. Their fleets, built-in Alexandria or the Syrian ports, rode the waters of the Mediterranean, pillaged the Greek islands, and challenged the naval power of the Byzantine Empire.

Their success had been won so easily, the Persians and Berbers of the Atlas Mountains alone offering a serious resistance, that at the beginning of the eighth century it must have seemed an open question whether any final obstacle could be opposed to their victorious course.

The Mediterranean had ceased to be a Roman lake. From one end of Europe to the other, the Christian states found themselves confronted with the challenge of a new Oriental civilization founded on a new Oriental faith.” (H. A. L. Fisher, “A History of Europe”, pp. 137 1 8.)

How did that stupendous miracle happen? That has been one of the baffling questions for historians. Today the educated world has rejected the vulgar theory that the rise of Islam was a triumph of fanaticism over sober and tolerant peoples.

The phenomenal success of Islam was primarily due to its revolutionary significance and its ability to lead the masses out of the hopeless situation created by the decay of antique civilizations not only of Greece and Rome but of Persia and China and of India