The Summary Of The Unsheathed Sword Against The One Who Insults The Messenger pdf download

The Summary Of The Unsheathed Sword Against The One Who Insults The Messenger By Shaykh Ul-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah a Summarized by Al-‘Allamah Muhammad AI-Ba’ali Al Hanbali

THE SUMMARY OF THE UNSHEATHED SWORD AGAINST THE ONE WHO INSULTS THE MESSENGER

Al-Khattabi’ said:

I do not know anyone who differed concerning the obligation of killing such a person. Muhammad bin Sahnin said:

The scholars have consensus that whoever insults the Messenger (attributing a defect to him), then such a person a is a disbeliever and that whoever doubts such a persons disbelief,

they too are guilty of disbelief And the saying that the Muslim who insults is killed, there being no disagreement concerning that, then this is the view of the four imams and other than them. And the dhimmi is to be killed also according to Malik and the people of Madinah.

This is also the view of Ahmad and those with understanding of the hadith (Fuqaha ul-hadith); there being numerous texts from Ahmad upon this Hanbal, Abu Saqr, Al-Khallal, Abdullah and Abu Talib narrated that the Muslim and disbeliever are to be killed. It was said to Ahmad: ‘Is that in the hadith?’

He replied: Yes, in several hadith; from them: the hadith of the blind man who killed a woman when he heard her insulting the Prophet 4% and the hadith of Husayn.! Imam Ahmad said: And repentance is not to be sought from them. Abu Bakr reported it in (the book) ‘Ash Shafi’.

So there is no difference of opinion narrated from him concerning the killing and that it breaks the covenant (between the dhimmi and the Muslim state).

 And Al Qadi’ mentioned in a narration concerning the dhimmi chat it doesn’t break the covenant, following in this group from the companions (of Ahmad) like Ash-Shareef, Aqil, Abu Al-Khattab and Al-Huluwni.

So they mentioned two narrations concerning the actions which constitute a belittlement of the Muslims or one of them, their selves, or their property or religion, such as insulting the Messenger, along with their agreement that the covenant is broken due to that according to the

Then all of them mentioned that the one who insults the Messenger 3% is to be killed, even if they are a dhimmi and that this breaks their covenant.

Shaykh ul-Iskim said: And this is what is closest to the truth from these routes of transmission and according to the narration that says:

‘their covenant is not broken due to thar,’ then it is only the case when that is not made a condition upon them (the dhimmis), then if it is made a condition, concerning that there are two views: The first of them: that they break their covenant by that, as Al Khiraqi said and as was held to be correct by Al-Amidi.

 The second: that it does not break their covenant, as Al Qadi said. And that which the generality of those who preceded from our companions and from those who followed them from those who came later on is the affirmation of the texts concerning that case.

And there are texts from them that the one who insults the Messenger 3% is to be killed and that this necessitates the breaking of their covenant, like their spying upon the Muslims, or committing fornication or adultery with a Muslim woman or by killing a Muslim or committing highway robbery.

 And from them also that slandering a Muslim or committing sorcery upon them does not constitute a breach of their covenant. Shaykh ul-Islam said: And this is what is compulsory, to affirm what they related as nothing is excluded from it due to the distinction between its texts.